Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context
Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00343400220122025
复制
发表时间：
2002-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Grabher, G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grabher, G
对项目的特别关注（见LUNDIN和SO DERHOLM，1995年; MIDLER，1995年; LUNDIN和MIDLER，《区域研究特刊的目的》，1998年; LINDKVIST等人，1998; EKSTEDT等人，1999;概念术语，是为HOBDAY，1998，2000提供分析关键词; GANN和SALTER，2000）。解决基于项目的这些明显的悖论关于项目作为“临时系统”与组织的争论。我们从一个假设开始，即解决方案“制度化的终止”（LUNDIN和SO DER-这些悖论必须在相互关系霍尔姆中找到，1995年）似乎表明进一步转移（或在“临时”项目之间，一方面，扩大）的重点从公司间到“永久”组织，1关系和网络围绕个人水平。事实上，一些作者（BOLTANSKI和他们所建立的，另一方面（见EKSTEDT等人，CHIAPELLO，1999）见项目团队，其成功是1999; SYDOW和WINDELER，1999; GANN和部分精确地衡量他们的短暂性，作为SALTER，2000; GRABHER，2001 b）。不同的措辞，特刊并不打算借给经验的新单位的经济行动。0034 -3404打印/1360-0591在线/02/030205-10© 2002年区域研究协会DOI：10.1080/00343400220122025 http：//www.区域研究协会英国
SPECIAL ISSUE attention towards projects (see LUNDIN and SO DERHOLM, 1995; MIDLER, 1995; LUNDIN and MIDLER, The aim of this Special Issue of Regional Studies, in 1998; LINDKVIST et al., 1998; EKSTEDT et al., 1999; conceptual terms, is to provide analytical keys for HOBDAY, 1998, 2000; GANN and SALTER, 2000). resolving these apparent paradoxes of project-based The debate on projects as ‘temporary systems’ with organizing. We start from the assumption that a solution ‘institutionalized termination’(LUNDIN and SO DER- to these paradoxes has to be found in the interrelation HOLM, 1995) seems to suggest a further shift (or between ‘temporary’projects, ontheonehand, andthe widening) of focus from the inter-firm to the inter-‘permanent’organizations, 1 ties and networks around personal level. In fact, some authors (BOLTANSKI and which they are built, on the other (see EKSTEDT et al., CHIAPELLO, 1999) see project teams, whose success is 1999; SYDOW and WINDELER, 1999; GANN and measured in part precisely in their transience, as the SALTER, 2000; GRABHER, 2001b). Phrased diVerently, the Special Issue is not intended to lend empirical new unit of economic action.0034-3404 print/1360-0591 online/02/030205-10© 2002 Regional Studies Association DOI: 10.1080/00343400220122025 http://www. regional-studies-assoc. ac. uk