The measurement of unemployment: An empirical approach
The measurement of unemployment: An empirical approach
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/1468-0262.00007
复制
发表时间:
1999-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.1
通讯作者:
Riddell, WC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jones, SRG;Riddell, WC
THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE and labor force participation rate are two of the most widely cited and closely monitored economic statistics. Yet the definition of unemployment, and the associated definition of participation, remain controversial. 2 For the nonemployed, many countries base the distinction between unemployment (U) and out-of-the-labor force (0) primarily on job search. 3 However, the behavior of some nonsearchers suggests that they are attached to the labor force, and thus should perhaps be measured as U. For example, there has been considerable debate about whether to classify" discouraged workers"-those who indicate that they want work but did not search because they believe no work is available-as U or 0 (National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics (1979), OECD (1987, 1995)). At the same time, some forms of job search are less intensive than others, and in terms of their labor force attachment some searchers may be more appropriately classified as 0. The difficult nature of these measurement questions is illustrated by differences in criteria across countries and over time within countries. For example, the United States classifies as 0 those who employ only" passive" methods of job search-for example, looking at job ads-while Canada and many other OECD countries include both" passive" and" active" searchers among the unemployed (Stein (1967), Zagorsky (1996)). On the other hand, discouraged workers were classified as U in the US prior to 1967 and