Reply to: Non-trivial role of internal climate feedback on interglacial temperature evolution
Reply to: Non-trivial role of internal climate feedback on interglacial temperature evolution
复制标题
回复:内部气候反馈对间冰期温度演化的重要作用
DOI:
10.1038/s41586-021-03931-3
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
64.8
通讯作者:
Zeng, Cheng
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bova, Samantha;Rosenthal, Yair;Liu, Zhengyu;Yan, Mi;Broccoli, Anthony J.;Godad, Shital P.;Zeng, Cheng
Quantifying seasonal bias in proxy reconstructions (for example, sea surface temperature (SST)) has been a long-standing challenge, hampering our understanding of past climate evolution (for example, the Holocene temperature conundrum) 1, 2. Recently, Bova et al. 3 proposed a seasonal to mean annual transformation (SAT) method that seems to effectively remove SST signal caused by seasonal insolation change. To extract mean annual SST (MASST) change for the Holocene epoch (12–0 thousand years before present (kyr bp)), Bova et al. 3 selected SST records that additionally cover the last interglacial (LIG; 128–115 kyr bp) period, for which SST is assumed to be solely attributed to variations in local solar insolation, hence allowing for reliable quantification of seasonal bias in SST records. However, this assumption is fundamentally incorrect because it overlooks the roles of internal Earth system feedback (for example, sea ice) on LIG temperature change, indicating that their findings are effectively biased by overcorrecting insolation-induced seasonal bias in SST proxies. We agree that global ice volume and greenhouse gas concentrations were relatively stable during the LIG (Fig. 1a, b) and their direct contributions to seasonally unadjusted SST (SSTsn) changes might be trivial, in comparison to the seasonal insolation change. However, this does not mean that contemporary internal feedbacks of the system also have a trivial role. Among various internal feedbacks (for example, sea ice, cloud, vegetation and so on), sea ice is one representative example for the LIG because it experienced significant contemporary advances as suggested by reconstructions 4, 5 and climate models 5–7. Sea ice–albedo feedback is a well-acknowledged effectively positive feedback on temperature changes. Recently, England et al. 8 conducted a sensitivity experiment applying a Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 sea-ice scenario—including an approximately 35% winter sea-ice loss in the Southern Ocean and an approximately 70% summer sea-ice loss in the Arctic (perennial sea-ice remnants persist)—under an otherwise present-day climate background. They found that the polar sea-ice loss can directly cause an increase of tropical MASST by more than 0.6 C (Fig. 2). In particular, all of the core locations used in Bova et al. 3 are characterized by mean annual warming with magnitudes in a range between 0.4 and 1 C.During the peak warm period of the LIG (128–125 kyr bp), both polar regions experienced significant sea-ice losses 4, 5 (for example, Antarctic winter sea ice may have retreated by up to 65%(ref. 6) and a summer sea-ice-free condition probably happened in the Arctic 7) that were more than those imposed in ref. 8. Following that, sea-ice volume increased markedly (note that their driving mechanisms might be different—the former is mainly driven by obliquity-induced mean annual insolation