AFFECT, CULTURE, AND MORALITY, OR IS IT WRONG TO EAT YOUR DOG
AFFECT, CULTURE, AND MORALITY, OR IS IT WRONG TO EAT YOUR DOG
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613
复制
发表时间：
1993-10-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
DIAS, MG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HAIDT, J;KOLLER, SH;DIAS, MG
恶心或不尊重的行为是否会被视为违反道德行为，即使它们是无害的？向巴西和美国社会经济地位高低的成人和儿童（N = 360）讲述了有关无受害者但具有攻击性的行为（例如用旗帜清洁厕所）的故事。结果显示，精英大学的大学生认为这些故事是社会习俗或个人喜好的问题。大多数其他党卫军，尤其是巴西的党卫队，对这些行为采取了说教立场。对于后面的这些 Ss，通过情感反应比通过危害性评估可以更好地预测道德判断。结果支持文化心理学的主张（R. A. Shweder，1991a），并表明文化规范和文化塑造的情感对道德领域和道德判断过程具有重大影响。提出了建立跨文化有效的道德判断模型的建议。
Are disgusting or disrespectful actions judged to be moral violations, even when they are harmless? Stories about victimless yet offensive actions (such as cleaning one's toilet with a flag) were presented to Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status (N = 360). Results show that college students at elite universities judged these stories to be matters of social convention or of personal preference. Most other Ss, especially in Brazil, took a moralizing stance toward these actions. For these latter Ss, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness. Results support the claims of cultural psychology (R. A. Shweder, 1991a) and suggest that cultural norms and culturally shaped emotions have a substantial impact on the domain of morality and the process of moral judgment. Suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment.