Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science
Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science
复制标题
作为正式工具的游戏与作为逻辑和科学解释的游戏
DOI：
10.1023/a:1026319711838
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
A. Pietarinen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Pietarinen
本文讨论了博弈的理论概念，因为它跨越了科学研究，探索了它作为逻辑和科学中的技术和形式资产与解释机制的用途。虽然游戏是一种在广泛的知识领域（包括但不限于哲学，逻辑学，数学，认知科学，人工智能，计算，语言学，物理学，经济学）中广泛使用的方法，但每个学科都主张自己的方法论，缺乏统一的理解。本文的第一部分对博弈论的一些正式研究进行了评述。在第二部分中，对游戏作为逻辑解释的学说进行了评估，并讨论了游戏的概念分析与认知的相关性。有人建议，进化的概念扮演一个游戏理论的意义概念的一部分。
This paper addresses the theoretical notion of a game as it arisesacross scientific inquiries, exploring its uses as a technical andformal asset in logic and science versus an explanatory mechanism. Whilegames comprise a widely used method in a broad intellectual realm(including, but not limited to, philosophy, logic, mathematics,cognitive science, artificial intelligence, computation, linguistics,physics, economics), each discipline advocates its own methodology and aunified understanding is lacking. In the first part of this paper, anumber of game theories in formal studies are critically surveyed. Inthe second part, the doctrine of games as explanations for logic isassessed, and the relevance of a conceptual analysis of games tocognition discussed. It is suggested that the notion of evolution playsa part in the game-theoretic concept of meaning.