Effect of Different Speeds of Up-and-down Motion on Canal Centering Ability and Vertical Force and Torque Generation of Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments

Effect of Different Speeds of Up-and-down Motion on Canal Centering Ability and Vertical Force and Torque Generation of Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.joen.2018.10.002
复制
发表时间:
2019-01-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Okiji, Takashi
Okiji, Takashi
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Maki, Keiichiro;Ebihara, Arata;Okiji, Takashi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

简介:本研究旨在评估上下运动的速度如何影响 ProTaper Next 旋转器械(瑞士 Ballaigues 的 Dentsply Maillefer)的根管定心能力和扭矩/力生成。方法:使用 ProTaper Next X1、X2 和 X3 仪器,使用原创的自动化根管仪器和扭矩/力分析装置,制备 21 个 1 形根管的模拟树脂根管块,上下速度设置为 10、50 和 100 mm/min(分别为低速、中速和高速组)。叠加仪器使用前和仪器后的图像,并在距离顶点 0-3 毫米处计算居中比。还记录了最大垂直力和扭矩。使用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验对结果进行统计分析。结果:在距顶点 0、0.5、1 和 2 mm 处,高速组显示出最低的对中比(即偏差最小),其次是中速组和低速组 (P < .05)。随着上下速度的增加,力值(向下和向上)趋于增加;对于 X2 和 X3 仪器,高速和/或中速组产生的值明显大于低速组 (P < .05)。对于所有仪器,高速和/或中速组产生的顺时针扭矩明显大于低速组 (P < .05)。低速组和高速组分别有 1 台和 2 台 X2 仪器发生断裂。结论:升降速度影响ProTaper Next器械的根管对中能力和应力产生。高速组表现出最好的对中能力,但往往比中速组和低速组产生更大的垂直力和扭矩。
Introduction: This study was performed to evaluate how the speed of up-and-down motion affects the canal centering ability and torque/force generation of ProTaper Next rotary instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Methods: Twenty-one simulated resin canal blocks with a 1-shaped canal were prepared with ProTaper Next X1, X2, and X3 instruments using an original automated root canal instrumentation and torque/force analyzing device with up-and-down speed settings of 10, 50, and 100 mm/ min (low-, medium-, and high-speed groups, respectively). Pre- and post instrumentation images were superimposed, and centering ratios were calculated at 0-3 mm from the apex. The maximum vertical force and torque were also recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. Results: At 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm from the apex, the high-speed group showed the lowest centering ratio (ie, least deviation) followed by the medium-speed and low-speed groups (P < .05). Force values (downward and upward) tended to increase as the up-and-down speed increased; with the X2 and X3 instruments, the high-speed and/or medium-speed groups generated significantly larger values than the low-speed group (P < .05). With all instruments, the high-speed and/or medium-speed groups generated significantly larger clockwise torque than the low-speed group (P < .05). One and 2 X2 instruments fractured in the low- and high-speed groups, respectively. Conclusions: The up-and-down speed affected the canal centering ability and stress generation of ProTaper Next instruments. The high-speed group showed the best centering ability but tended to generate larger vertical force and torque than the medium- and low-speed groups.