Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation
Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.005
复制
发表时间:
2006-03-01
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Mehta, MP
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aoyama, H;Westerly, DC;Mehta, MP
Background: This study was designed to evaluate the integral (lose (ID) received by normal tissue from intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: Twenty-five radiation treatment plans including IMRT using a conventional linac with both 6 MV (6MV-IMRT) and 20 MV (20MV-IMRT), as well as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using 6 MV (6MV-3DCRT) and 20 MV (20MV-3DCRT) and IMRT using tomotherapy (6MV) (Tomo-IMRT), were created for 5 patients with localized prostate cancer. The ID (mean dose X tissue volume) received by normal tissue (NTID) was calculated from dose-volume histograms.Results: The 6MV-IMRT resulted in 5.0% lower NTID than 6MV-3DCRT; 20 MV beam plans resulted in 7.7%-11.2% lower NTID than 6MV-3DCRT. Tomo-IMRT NTID was comparable to 6MV-IMRT. Compared with 6MV-3DCRT, 6MV-IMRT reduced IDs to the rectal wall and penile bulb by 6.1% and 2.7%, respectively. Tomo-IMRT further reduced these IDs by 11.9% and 16.5%, respectively. The 20 MV did not reduce IDs to those structures.Conclusions: The difference in NTID between 3DCRT and IMRT is small. The 20 MV plans somewhat reduced NTID compared with 6 MV plans. The advantage of tomotherapy over conventional IMRT and 3DCRT for localized prostate cancer was demonstrated in regard to (lose sparing of rectal wall and penile bulb while slightly decreasing NTID as compared with 6MV-3DCRT. C) 2006 Elsevier Inc.