Pregaming Potentiates Risk Between UPPS-P Impulsivity and Day-Level Drinking Behavior: A Test of Person-Environment Transactions Theory

Pregaming Potentiates Risk Between UPPS-P Impulsivity and Day-Level Drinking Behavior: A Test of Person-Environment Transactions Theory
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/pha0000695
复制
发表时间:
2023-11-30
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Corbin,William R.
Corbin,William R.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
King,Scott E.;Waddell,Jack T.;Corbin,William R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对于年轻人来说,婚前饮酒是一种独特的高风险饮酒事件,冲动性的子方面是酒精使用和相关负面结果的强有力预测因素。此外,赛前事件可能包含对冲动个体特别有吸引力的社会和身体刺激,从而加剧了负面结果的风险。然而,没有先前的研究调查了冲动的人格特质与赛前事件相互作用的程度,以赋予酒精相关的风险。因此,本研究探讨在何种程度上UPPS-P(紧迫性-毅力-预谋-寻求感觉-积极紧迫性)的冲动性子方面与pregaming的发生相互作用,预测pregaming,饮酒量和负酒精相关的结果之间的关系。大学生(N= 737)完成了一个修改后的,在线版本的30天时间轴随访,其中他们报告了饮酒量,负面后果,以及他们是否从事pregaming在给定的一天。结果表明,感觉寻求和缺乏预谋的缓和pregaming和饮酒量之间的关系,这些谁是更高的感觉寻求和更低的能力,提前计划喝更多的pregaming天。感觉寻求和积极的紧迫感调节了游戏前和消极后果之间的关系,比如那些积极紧迫感较高的人在游戏前经历了更多的后果,而那些感觉寻求较高的人经历了更少的后果。未来的研究可能会受益于更细粒度的评估孕氨相关的风险,因为冲动的子方面可能会带来瞬间的风险。针对减少赌博前频率的预防措施,特别是在冲动的人中,可能会降低大量饮酒的总体风险。
Pregaming represents a uniquely high-risk drinking event for young adults, and subfacets of impulsivity are robust predictors of alcohol use and related negative outcomes. Further, it is likely that pregame events contain social and physical stimuli that are particularly appealing for impulsive individuals, thus exacerbating risk for negative outcomes. However, no prior studies have investigated the extent to which impulsive personality traits interact with pregame events to confer alcohol-related risk. Thus, the present study examined the extent to which UPPS-P (urgency–perseverance–premeditation–sensation seeking–positive urgency) subfacets of impulsivity interact with the occurrence of pregaming to predict relations between pregaming, drinking quantity, and negative alcohol-related outcomes. College students (N= 737) completed a modified, online version of the 30-day Timeline Followback in which they reported drinking quantity, negative consequences, and whether they engaged in pregaming on a given day. Results indicated that sensation seeking and a lack of premeditation moderated relations between pregaming and drinking quantity such that those who are higher in sensation seeking and lower in their ability to plan ahead drank more on pregaming days. Sensation seeking and positive urgency moderated relations between pregaming and negative consequences such that those who are higher in positive urgency experience more consequences on pregaming days whereas those who are higher in sensation seeking experience less consequences. Future studies may benefit from more granular assessments of pregame-related risk as subfacets of impulsivity may confer momentary risk. Prevention efforts targeting the reduction of pregaming frequency, particularly among impulsive individuals, may lower overall risk for heavy drinking.