Correlation Between Appropriate Use Criteria and the Frequency of Subclinical Spread or Reconstruction With a Flap or Graft for Melanomas Treated With Mohs Surgery With Melanoma Antigen Recognized by T Cells 1 Immunostaining.
Correlation Between Appropriate Use Criteria and the Frequency of Subclinical Spread or Reconstruction With a Flap or Graft for Melanomas Treated With Mohs Surgery With Melanoma Antigen Recognized by T Cells 1 Immunostaining.
复制标题
适当使用标准与使用 T 细胞识别的黑色素瘤抗原进行莫氏手术治疗的黑色素瘤的皮瓣或移植物亚临床扩散或重建的频率之间的相关性 1 免疫染色。
DOI:
10.1097/dss.0000000000000693
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Miller,ChristopherJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Etzkorn,JeremyR;Sobanko,JosephF;Shin,ThuzarM;Elenitsas,Rosalie;Chu,EmilyY;Gelfand,JoelM;Margolis,DavidJ;Newman,JasonG;Goldbach,Hayley;Miller,ChristopherJ
BACKGROUNDPublished appropriate use criteria (AUC) for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma are based on consensus opinion.OBJECTIVETo evaluate whether published AUC identify melanomas for which MMS may benefit patients by detecting subclinical spread or confirming clear microscopic margins before flap or graft reconstruction.MATERIALS AND METHODSRetrospective cohort study of 591 melanomas in 556 patients evaluating the correlation between current AUC (anatomic location, recurrent status, and tumor stage) and subclinical spread or reconstruction with a flap or graft.RESULTSAnatomic location on the head, neck, genitalia, hands, feet, or pretibial leg was associated with a significantly higher frequency of subclinical spread (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, p=. 0280) and flap or graft reconstruction (OR 10.3, p=. 0001). Compared with primary lesions, recurrent melanomas had a higher frequency of subclinical spread (OR 1.78, p=. 0104) and reconstruction with a flap or graft (OR 1.67, p=. 0217). The frequencies of subclinical spread and flap or graft reconstruction did not differ between in situ and invasive melanomas.CONCLUSIONAnatomic location and recurrent status are useful criteria to identify melanomas that may benefit from MMS. Tumor stage is not a useful criterion, as MMS has similar benefits for subsets of both invasive and in situ melanomas.