Performance of the Dutch Energy Sector based on energy, exergy and Extended Exergy Accounting.
Performance of the Dutch Energy Sector based on energy, exergy and Extended Exergy Accounting.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.010
复制
发表时间：
2006-12
影响因子：
6.4
通讯作者：
K. Ptasinkski;M. N. Koymans;B. Verspagen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Ptasinkski;M. N. Koymans;B. Verspagen
荷兰能源部门的表现进行了分析，使用标准分析以及扩展的（火用）会计（EEA）方法。基于能量、火用和累积火用消耗（CExC）的性能指标针对三个分部门进行评估：能源的开采、转换和分配。结果表明，基于CExC的性能指标远低于基于能量和火用概念的性能指标。EEA方法适用于分析四个分支：焦化厂和炼油厂，炼油厂，中央电力生产，配电和分散电力生产。对Sciubba最初提出的EEA方法进行了改进，从原料的货币价值和CExC中评估成本-火用转换因子。有人发现，货币当量的扩展火用高于各自的产品销售。最后，它示出的性能指标的基础上选择的能量分支的扩展火用远低于那些基于CExC。
The performance of the Dutch Energy Sector is analyzed using the Standard Exergy Analysis as well as Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) method. Performance indicators based on energy, exergy and cumulative exergy consumption (CExC) are evaluated for three subsectors: exploitation, transformation, and distribution of energy. It is shown that performance indicators based on CExC are much lower than those based on energy and exergy concepts. The EEA method is applied for analysis of four branches: cokeries and refineries, refineries, central electricity production, and distribution and decentral electricity production. The EEA method originally proposed by Sciubba is modified by evaluating the cost-to-exergy conversion factor from the monetary value and CExC of the feedstock. It was found that the monetary equivalent of extended exergy is higher than the respective product sales. Finally, it is shown that performance indicators of selected energy branches based on extended exergy are much lower than those based on the CExC.