Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: alternative explanations to the protective effect of marriage.

Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: alternative explanations to the protective effect of marriage.
复制标题

中年婚姻史作为长寿的预测因素:婚姻保护作用的另一种解释。

DOI:
10.1037//0278-6133.15.2.94
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Schwartz,JE
Schwartz,JE
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tucker,JS;Friedman,HS;Wingard,DL;Schwartz,JE

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

中年婚姻史(1950 年)与死亡率(截至 1991 年)之间的关系在一组聪明、受过教育的男性和女性(N = 1,077)中进行了研究,这些男性和女性参与了刘易斯·特曼 (Lewis Terman) 于 1921 年发起的特曼生命周期研究。结果证实,持续结婚的人比经历过婚姻破裂的人寿命更长,但表明这不一定是由于婚姻本身的保护作用。与一直结婚的人相比,目前已婚但之前经历过离婚的人的死亡风险明显更高。此外,与一直结婚的人相比,中年未婚的人的死亡风险并不更高。婚姻史和死亡风险之间的部分关系可以通过儿童心理社会变量来解释,这些变量与未来的婚姻史和死亡风险相关。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)
The association between marital history at midlife (in 1950) and mortality (as of 1991) was studied in a group of intelligent, educated men and women (N= 1,077) who participated in the Terman Life-Cycle Study initiated by Lewis Terman in 1921. Results confirm that consistently married people live longer than those who have experienced marital breakup but suggest that this is not necessarily due to the protective effects of marriage itself. Individuals who were currently married, but had previously experienced a divorce, were at significantly higher mortality risk compared with consistently married individuals. Furthermore, individuals who had not married by midlife were not at higher mortality risk compared with consistently married individuals. Part of the relationship between marital history and mortality risk may be explained by childhood psychosocial variables, which were associated with both future marital history and mortality risk.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)