Occupational injury rates among Norwegian farmers: A sociotechnical perspective
Occupational injury rates among Norwegian farmers: A sociotechnical perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.001
复制
发表时间：
2021-06-04
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Holte, Kari Anne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kjestveit, Kari;Aas, Oddfrid;Holte, Kari Anne
导言：这项研究探讨了挪威农民的相对伤害风险，他们大多是个体户，经营着小型农场企业。其目的是探讨个人、企业和工作环境风险对职业伤害的相对重要性，并利用社会技术系统理论讨论伤害的潜在条件。方法：通过2012年11月对挪威农场主的调查，收集伤害报告和危险因素。有效率为40%(n=2,967)。每年的工作时间被用来计算组内的伤害率。泊松回归使用工作时间的对数作为补偿变量，允许对损伤风险预测变量的调整比率进行建模。最后，引入了安全气候措施来评估对风险的潜在缓和效果。结果：工伤的主要危险因素是工作场所的设计、生产类型和非农场工作时间。在增加安全气候措施时，主要结果保持不变，但这些措施降低了主要生产类别的伤害风险，增加了与家庭成员和/或雇员一起工作的农民的风险。一个总体的发现是，风险因素是如何相互关联的。结论：这项研究确定了农民群体内部和群体之间的巨大结构差异。这项研究引起了人们对操作条件的关注，而不是个人特征。农民的角色(管理责任)与法规和安全氛围对伤害风险的讨论是重要的。实际应用：我们需要研究分组，以了解监管和结构变化如何影响受生产制约的不同工作系统内的工作条件和管理。重要的是要鼓励政治经济系统中的行为者参与已发现影响农民安全的问题。(C)2021年提交人(S)。由国家安全委员会和爱思唯尔有限公司出版。这是一篇由(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).许可的CC下的开放获取文章
Introduction: This study addressed relative injury risk among Norwegian farmers, who are mostly self-employed and run small farm enterprises. The aim was to explore the relative importance of individual, enterprise, and work environment risks for occupational injury and to discuss the latent conditions for injuries using sociotechnical system theory. Method: Injury report and risk factors were collected through a survey among Norwegian farm owners in November 2012. The response rate was 40% (n = 2,967). Annual work hours were used to calculate injury rates within groups. Poisson regression using the log of hours worked as the offset variable allowed for the modeling of adjusted rate ratios for variables pre-dictive of injury risk. Finally, safety climate measures were introduced to assess potential moderating effects on risk. Results: Results showed that the most important risk factors for injuries were the design of the workplace, type of production, and off-farm work hours. The main results remained unchanged when adding safety climate measures, but the measures moderated the injury risk for categories of pre -dominant production and increased the risk for farmers working with family members and/or employees. An overall finding is how the risk factors were interrelated. Conclusions: The study identified large struc-tural diversities within and between groups of farmers. The study drew attention to operating conditions rather than individual characteristics. The farmer's role (managerial responsibility) versus regulation and safety climate is important for discussions of injury risk. Practical Applications: We need to study sub-groups to understand how regulation and structural changes affect work conditions and management within different work systems, conditioned by production. It is important to encourage actors in the political-economic system to become involved in issues that were found to affect the safety of farmers.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by the National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).