Spitting on my sources: Depression, DNA, and the ambivalent historian
Spitting on my sources: Depression, DNA, and the ambivalent historian
复制标题
吐槽我的资料来源：抑郁症、DNA 和矛盾的历史学家
DOI：
10.1002/jhbs.22219
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Moran, Rachel Louise
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moran, Rachel Louise
在写一本关于美国产后抑郁症历史的书时，我对一项正在进行的关于产后精神疾病可能的遗传标记的研究产生了兴趣。我参与了第一步，在线调查。当我有资格进行下一步——唾液采集时，我犹豫是否要继续。做出这一决定需要反思一些重叠的问题：性别、医学化、基因研究以及 DNA 捐赠的政治功能。在这篇观点文章中，我探讨了将自己置于历史研究项目中的紧张关系。
While writing a book on the history of postpartum depression in the United States, I became interested in an ongoing study about possible genetic markers of postpartum mental illness. I participated in the first step, an online survey. When I qualified for the next step, saliva collection, I was torn over whether or not to continue. Making this decision required reflecting on some overlapping issues: gender, medicalization, genetic research, and the political functions of DNA donation. In this perspectives essay, I explore tensions around situating myself in my historical research project.