Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device.
Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device.
复制标题
以技术为基础,循证驱动和以患者为中心的:将软件作为医疗设备进行调节的前进之路。
DOI:
10.2196/34038
复制
发表时间:
2022-01-27
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Banerjee A
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carolan JE;McGonigle J;Dennis A;Lorgelly P;Banerjee A
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad discipline that aims to understand and design systems that display properties of intelligence. Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that describes how algorithms and models can assist computer systems in progressively improving their performance. In health care, an increasingly common application of AI/ML is software as a medical device (SaMD), which has the intention to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate, or prevent disease. AI/ML includes either “locked” or “continuous learning” algorithms. Locked algorithms consistently provide the same output for a particular input. Conversely, continuous learning algorithms, in their infancy in terms of SaMD, modify in real-time based on incoming real-world data, without controlled software version releases. This continuous learning has the potential to better handle local population characteristics, but with the risk of reinforcing existing structural biases. Continuous learning algorithms pose the greatest regulatory complexity, requiring seemingly continuous oversight in the form of special controls to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness. We describe the challenges of continuous learning algorithms, then highlight the new evidence standards and frameworks under development, and discuss the need for stakeholder engagement. The paper concludes with 2 key steps that regulators need to address in order to optimize and realize the benefits of SaMD: first, international standards and guiding principles addressing the uniqueness of SaMD with a continuous learning algorithm are required and second, throughout the product life cycle and appropriate to the SaMD risk classification, there needs to be continuous communication between regulators, developers, and SaMD end users to ensure vigilance and an accurate understanding of the technology.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
105.7
作者:
Vollmer, Sebastian;Mateen, Bilal A.;Hemingway, Harry
通讯作者:
Hemingway, Harry
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Gilbert S;Fenech M;Hirsch M;Upadhyay S;Biasiucci A;Starlinger J
通讯作者:
Starlinger J
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Unsworth H;Dillon B;Collinson L;Powell H;Salmon M;Oladapo T;Ayiku L;Shield G;Holden J;Patel N;Campbell M;Greaves F;Joshi I;Powell J;Tonnel A
通讯作者:
Tonnel A
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Norgeot B;Quer G;Beaulieu-Jones BK;Torkamani A;Dias R;Gianfrancesco M;Arnaout R;Kohane IS;Saria S;Topol E;Obermeyer Z;Yu B;Butte AJ
通讯作者:
Butte AJ
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Liu X;Cruz Rivera S;Moher D;Calvert MJ;Denniston AK;SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group
通讯作者:
SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group