Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure
Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.3
复制
发表时间：
1998-01-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Jacoby, LL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jacoby, LL
三个实验研究了分离记忆的有意识控制和自动影响的过程分离程序的假设。鼓励直接检索的条件揭示了过程分离。在学习过程中控制注意力或控制学习时间会影响记忆，但记忆的自动影响相对不变。然而，当条件鼓励使用生成-识别策略时，就会发现矛盾的分离，这违反了估计程序的假设。使用主观报告来获得估计会产生类似的结果。事实证明，容易观察到的相关性对于测试过程分离程序的假设没有用处。多项式模型产生的结果与过程分离方法的结果一致。
Three experiments investigated assumptions of the process-dissociation procedure for separating consciously controlled and automatic influences of memory. Conditions that encouraged direct retrieval revealed process dissociations. Manipulating attention during study or manipulating study time affected recollection but left automatic influences of memory relatively invariant. However, paradoxical dissociations were found when conditions encouraged use of a generate-recognize strategy, violating assumptions underlying the estimation procedure. Use of subjective reports to gain estimates produced parallel results. Easily observed correlations are shown to be not useful for testing assumptions underlying the process-dissocation procedure. A multinomial model produced results that agree with those from the process-dissociation approach.