Plasma Amyloid and in vivo Brain Amyloid in Late Middle-Aged Hispanics.
Plasma Amyloid and in vivo Brain Amyloid in Late Middle-Aged Hispanics.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3233/jad-210391
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Luchsinger, Jose A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rippon, Brady;Palta, Priya;Tahmi, Mouna;Sherwood, Greysi;Soto, Luisa;Cespedes, Sandino;Mesen, Yanette;He, Hengda;Laing, Krystal;Moreno, Herman;Teresi, Jeanne;Razlighi, Qolamreza;Brickman, Adam M.;Zetterberg, Henrik;Luchsinger, Jose A.
Determining amyloid positivity is possible with cerebrospinal fluid and brain imaging of amyloid, but these methods are invasive and expensive. To relate plasma amyloid β (Aβ), measured using Single-molecule array (Simoa™) assays, to in-vivo brain Aβ, measured using Positron Emission Tomography (PET), examine the accuracy of plasma Aβ to predict brain Aβ positivity, and the relation of APOE-ε4 with plasma Aβ. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 345 late middle-aged Hispanic men and women (age 64 years, 72% women). Our primary plasma variable was Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio measured with Simoa. Brain Aβ burden was measured as global SUVR with 18F-Florbetaben PET examined continuously and categorically. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was inversely associated with global Aβ SUVR (β = − 0.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −0.23, −0.03; p = 0.013) and Aβ positivity (Odds Ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.91; p = 0.016), independent of demographics and APOE-ε4. ROC curves (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.82; p < 0.0001), showed that the optimal threshold for plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in relation to brain Aβ positivity was 0.060 with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 62.8%. APOE-ε4 carriers had lower Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and a higher Aβ positivity determined with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio threshold of 0.060. plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio assayed using Simoa is weakly correlated with in-vivo brain amyloid, and has limited accuracy to screen for amyloid positivity and for studying risk factors of brain amyloid burden when in-vivo imaging is not feasible.