Examining the Construct Validity of Mastery-Avoidance Achievement Goals: A Meta-Analysis

Examining the Construct Validity of Mastery-Avoidance Achievement Goals: A Meta-Analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/08959285.2010.488463
复制
发表时间:
2010-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Lance, Charles E.
Lance, Charles E.
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Baranik, Lisa E.;Stanley, Laura J.;Lance, Charles E.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们使用元分析来获得成就目标的结构效度的全面观点,重点是成就目标框架的最新补充,掌握回避(Elliot McGregor,2001)。掌握-回避成就目标与成就需要、知觉能力、竞争力、兴趣、负性情感和其他成就目标(掌握-接近、表现-接近、表现-回避)呈正相关,与认知能力、求助和表现呈负相关。掌握回避与其他成就目标之间的相关为中等。因此,我们的结论是,掌握回避是一个概念和经验独特的前因和后果,并应包括在未来的成就目标的研究。
We used meta-analysis to obtain a comprehensive perspective on the construct validity of achievement goals, focusing on the most recent addition to the achievement goal framework, mastery-avoidance (Elliot McGregor, 2001). Mastery-avoidance achievement goals positively correlated with need for achievement, perceived competence, competitiveness, interest, negative affect, and other achievement goals (mastery-approach, performance-approach, performance-avoidance) and negatively correlated with cognitive ability, help seeking, and performance. The correlations between mastery-avoidance and the other achievement goals were moderate. Thus, we conclude that mastery-avoidance is a conceptually and empirically distinct construct with unique antecedents and consequences and should be included in future studies on achievement goals.