Short measurements of personality - Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S)
Short measurements of personality - Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008
复制
发表时间：
2012-06-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Spinath, Frank M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hahn, Elisabeth;Gottschling, Juliana;Spinath, Frank M.
在过去的十年中，可以观察到使用简短的个性测量的上升趋势。本研究的目的是探讨GSOEP大五量表（BFI-S: Gerlitz & Schupp, 2005）的心理测量特征。我们比较了598名德国成年人（平均年龄= 42岁）的BFI-S和NEO-PI-R （Costa & McCrae, 1992a, 1992b）。尽管在亲和性方面存在缺陷，但短量表总体上显示出可接受的水平：(1)内部一致性，(2)18个月的稳定性，(3)与NEO-PI-R相关的收敛效度和(4)判别效度。我们的结论是，在研究环境中，明显需要节俭，BFI-S提供了足够的效用水平。(C) 2012爱思唯尔公司版权所有。
In the last decade, an upward trend in the use of short measurements for personality can be observed. The goal of this study was to explore the psychometric characteristics of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S: Gerlitz & Schupp, 2005), a 15-item instrument. We compared the BFI-S with the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992a, 1992b) in a sample of 598 German adults (mean age = 42 years). Despite shortcomings for Agreeableness, the short scales generally showed acceptable levels of: (1) internal consistency, (2) stability over a period of 18 months, (3) convergent validity in relation to the NEO-PI-R and (4) discriminant validity. We conclude that in research settings with a pronounced need for parsimony, the BFI-S offers a sufficient level of utility. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.