SCREENING FOR PTSD AMONG INCARCERATED MEN: A Comparative Analysis of Computer-Administered and Orally Administered Modalities.
SCREENING FOR PTSD AMONG INCARCERATED MEN: A Comparative Analysis of Computer-Administered and Orally Administered Modalities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0093854814551601
复制
发表时间：
2015-02
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Frueh BC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wolff N;Gregory Chugo M;Shi J;Huening J;Frueh BC
在被监禁的男性人群中，遭受创伤的比例过高，并且与精神疾病发病率有关，特别是创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）。本研究测试了使用计算机访谈 (CAI) 与口头访谈 (OAI) 筛查被监禁男性 PTSD 的可行性、可靠性和有效性。采用 2 × 2 析因设计将 592 名被监禁男子随机分配至筛选模式。研究结果表明计算机筛查是可行的。与 OAI 相比，CAI 产生的 PTSD 症状筛查信息同样可靠，PTSD 检查表 (PCL) 总分的重测组内相关性范围为 0.774 至 0.817，临床医生管理的 PTSD 量表和 PCL 评分与 OAI 和 CAI 显着相关。这些发现表明，可以通过 CAI 技术可靠、有效地获得有关 PTSD 症状的数据，从而提高对被监禁人群筛查 PTSD 的效率，并识别出有风险的人进行治疗。
Trauma exposure is overrepresented in incarcerated male populations and is linked to psychiatric morbidity, particularly posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study tests the feasibility, reliability, and validity of using computer-administered interviewing (CAI) versus orally administered interviewing (OAI) to screen for PTSD among incarcerated men. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to randomly assign 592 incarcerated men to screening modality. Findings indicate that computer screening was feasible. Compared with OAI, CAI produced equally reliable screening information on PTSD symptoms, with test–retest intraclass correlations for the PTSD Checklist (PCL) total score ranging from .774 to .817, and the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale and PCL scores were significantly correlated for OAI and CAI. These findings indicate that data on PTSD symptoms can be reliably and validly obtained from CAI technology, increasing the efficiency by which incarcerated populations can be screened for PTSD, and those at risk can be identified for treatment.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0138
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Keen, Stefanie M.;Kutter, Catherine J.;Krinsley, Karen E.
通讯作者：
Krinsley, Karen E.
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Gibson, LE;Holt, JC;Turbitt, EL
通讯作者：
Turbitt, EL
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Mueser, KT;Rosenberg, SD;Carty, P
通讯作者：
Carty, P
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Harrington, Tracy;Newman, Elana
通讯作者：
Newman, Elana
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Grubaugh, Anouk L.;Elhai, Jon D.;Frueh, B. Christopher
通讯作者：
Frueh, B. Christopher