Cyclobutadiene: The antiaromatic paradigm?
Cyclobutadiene: The antiaromatic paradigm?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.200602279
复制
发表时间:
2006-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Bally, Thomas
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bally, Thomas
There is probably no other single molecule that has fascinated experimental and theoretical chemists so consistently over the past 40years as has cyclobutadiene (CBD). On average, 16 publications which deal, in one form or another, with the parent compound C4H4 and 40 which deal with cyclobutdienes in general have appeared in every year of this time span, and there are probably many more on derivatives and metal complexes. There is no sign that interest in CBD is about to wane, as the highest number of papers per year appeared in 2000 and 2002, and in the last five years two entire thematic issues of Chemical Reviews, both with many references to CBD, were dedicated to issues of aromaticity/antiaromaticity [1] and localization/delocalization,[2] that is, topics that are central to the debate on CBD.Recently the first direct and reasonably accurate determination of the enthalpy of formation of CBD has been achieved by the group of Kass.[3, 4] Thus they have provided a solid foundation for the discussion on the thermochemical consequences of antiaromaticity, and I take this occasion to reflect on recent developments in this field and to point out the pitfalls with which the resulting discussion is fraught. In spite of the great activity documented in the opening paragraph, many myths surround this fascinating molecule, most of which relate to the extent of delocalization of its π electrons and/or the degree of antiaromaticity. It is