Recovery from misinterpretations during online sentence processing.
Recovery from misinterpretations during online sentence processing.
复制标题
从在线句子处理过程中的误解中恢复过来。
DOI：
10.1037/xlm0000936
复制
发表时间：
2021-06
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Warren, Jane E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blott, Lena M.;Rodd, Jennifer M.;Ferreira, Fernanda;Warren, Jane E.
在语言理解过程中的误解是常见的。因此，从这种处理困难中恢复过来的能力对于成功的日常沟通至关重要。以往的研究主要集中在含有句法歧义的句子上。本研究旨在探讨当词汇语义歧义导致误读时，阅读理解过程和在线阅读行为的结果。96名成年参与者阅读“花园小径”句子，其中一个模棱两可的词被消除了歧义，朝着一个意想不到的含义（例如，球是拥挤的），而他们的眼球运动进行了监测。一个意义连贯性判断任务还要求他们决定每个句子是否有意义。结果表明，读者并不总是从事重新解释的过程，而是遵循一个“足够好”的处理策略。成功检测违反句子连贯性和相关的重新解释过程也需要额外的处理时间相比，句子，并没有引起误解。虽然这些重新解释相关的处理成本是相对稳定的个人，有一些证据表明，读者与更大的词汇专业知识受益于更大的敏感性消除歧义的信息，并能够灵活地适应他们的在线阅读行为，以更有效地从误解中恢复。
Misinterpretations during language comprehension are common. The ability to recover from such processing difficulties is therefore crucial for successful day-to-day communication. Previous research on the recovery from misinterpretations has focused on sentences containing syntactic ambiguities. The present study instead investigated the outcome of comprehension processes and on-line reading behaviour when misinterpretations occurred due to lexical-semantic ambiguity. Ninety-six adult participants read “garden-path” sentences in which an ambiguous word was disambiguated towards an unexpected meaning (e.g. The ball was crowded), while their eye movements were monitored. A Meaning Coherence Judgement task additionally required them to decide whether or not each sentence made sense. Results suggested that readers did not always engage in reinterpretation processes but instead followed a “good enough” processing strategy. Successful detection of a violation to sentence coherence and associated reinterpretation processes also required additional processing time compared to sentences that did not induce a misinterpretation. Although these reinterpretation-related processing costs were relatively stable across individuals, there was some evidence to suggest that readers with greater lexical expertise benefited from greater sensitivity to the disambiguating information, and were able to flexibly adapt their on-line reading behaviour to recover from misinterpretations more efficiently.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Ferreira, F
通讯作者：
Ferreira, F
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Ferreira, Fernanda;Patson, Nikole D.
通讯作者：
Patson, Nikole D.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Christianson, K;Hollingworth, A;Ferreira, F
通讯作者：
Ferreira, F
DOI：
10.3758/bf03210520
发表时间：
1968-01-01
期刊：
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
影响因子：
--
作者：
FOSS, DJ;BEVER, TG;SILVER, M
通讯作者：
SILVER, M
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Cromley, Jennifer G.;Azevedo, Roger
通讯作者：
Azevedo, Roger