Mediatization of Political Organizations: Changing Parties and Interest Groups?
Mediatization of Political Organizations: Changing Parties and Interest Groups?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1057/9781137275844_10
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Donges;Otfried Jarren
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Donges;Otfried Jarren
本章从政治组织的中观层面分析政治的中介化。根据本书的理论框架，我们的问题位于媒体化的第四个维度，即“政治行为者受政治逻辑或媒体逻辑支配的程度”（Strömbäck, 2008, p. 234；另见Strömbäck & Dimitrova， 2011）。我们的理论论证将挑战单一和同质的媒体逻辑，以及政治“对抗”媒体逻辑的明确二分法。相反，我们想论证的是，政治组织受到多种政治逻辑和媒体逻辑的影响。为了展开我们的论点，我们将首先讨论政党和利益集团等政治组织是什么样的行动者，以及我们可以从组织理论中了解到什么。其次，我们将提出以自然的、开放的组织系统观来拓宽我们的视野。第三，我们将在组织和体制一级重新制订调解的概念。第四，我们将通过对政党和利益集团组织的调查得出一些实证结果来说明我们的理论论点。
This chapter analyzes the mediatization of politics at the meso level of political organizations. According to the theoretical framework of this book, our issue is located on the fourth dimension of mediatization,“the degree to which political actors are governed by a political logic or by media logic”(Strömbäck, 2008, p. 234; see also Strömbäck & Dimitrova, 2011). Our theoretical argument will challenge the idea of a single and homogenous media logic and of a clear dichotomy of political “versus” media logic. Instead, we want to argue that political organizations are influenced by a diversity of political as well as media logics. To develop our argument, we will first discuss what kind of actors political organizations like parties and interest groups are and what we can learn about them from organizational theories. Secondly, we will propose that we should broaden our scope by natural and open system views of organizations. Thirdly, we will reformulate the concept of mediatization at an organizational and institutional level. Fourthly, we will present some empirical results from surveys of party and interest-group organizations to illustrate our theoretical argumentation.