Trigeminal PAD as disynaptically evoked by stimulation of the trigeminal sensory branches.
Trigeminal PAD as disynaptically evoked by stimulation of the trigeminal sensory branches.
复制标题
三叉神经 PAD 由三叉神经感觉分支刺激引起。
DOI:
10.1016/0006-8993(74)90871-3
复制
发表时间:
1974
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
S. Ishimine
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Nakamura;T. Murakami;S. Ishimine
The time course of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) has been determined by intra-axonal recording in the spinal cord4, 5 and the cuneate nucleus 1. The central latency of the peripherally evoked PAD in the spinal cord was reported to be usually 2.0-3.0 msec and the interneuronal chain for this PAD was assumed to consist of at least two interneurons in serial order z. In the cuneate nucleus the shortest latency from the arrival of the fastest component of the afferent volley at the cuneate nucleus to the onset of the PAD was shown to be 2.0-2.2 msec and the PAD was postulated to be induced via at least two synapses 1. In the trigeminal system, no intra-axonal study of the PAD has so far been reported and the time course of the trigeminal PAD has been followed only indirectly using Wall's technique2, 6. As the first step of the study of the central pathways for the trigeminal PAD, we tried to determine the central latency of the peripherally evoked PAD in the trigeminal nerve not only by Wall's technique 7 but also by an intra-axonal recording method. This report will describe those results which indicate that the trigeminal PAD can be evoked via one interneuron by stimulation of the trigeminal sensory branches. Experiments were performed on cats anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (35 mg/kg ip initially) and immobilized with gallamine triethiodide. The frontal (FR), infraorbital (IO) and lingual nerves (LING) on the right side were used for stimulation and recording. These nerves were separated from the surrounding tissue, sectioned peripherally and mounted on bipolar silver wire electrodes. The time course of PAD was examined indirectly by Wall's technique as well as directly by intra-axonal recording. In the former, a bipolar concentric electrode was inserted into the trigeminal spinal nucleus on the right side at the level of the subnucleus interpolaris to apply test shocks to the presynaptic terminals of the trigeminal primary afferent fibers, and the antidromically evoked potentials were recorded from FR, IO and LING. The conditioning shocks were applied to one of FR, IO and LING. For intra-axonal