Bmc Medical Research Methodology Content and Communication: How Can Peer Review Provide Helpful Feedback about the Writing?
Bmc Medical Research Methodology Content and Communication: How Can Peer Review Provide Helpful Feedback about the Writing?
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Shashok
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Shashok
背景资料：同行评议被认为可以提高研究报告的质量，作为科学交流的工具，但一直没有有力的证据表明这种结果是一致的。未能区分学科特定内容的各个方面和写作或语言使用的各个方面，可能是目前同行审查过程中存在的一些缺陷的原因。
Background: Peer review is assumed to improve the quality of research reports as tools for scientific communication, yet strong evidence that this outcome is obtained consistently has been elusive. Failure to distinguish between aspects of discipline-specific content and aspects of the writing or use of language may account for some deficiencies in current peer review processes.