Integration of risk identification with business process models

Integration of risk identification with business process models
复制标题

风险识别与业务流程模型的集成

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
N. Joshi
N. Joshi
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Lambert;R. K. Jennings;N. Joshi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在系统工程和各种技术系统中,广泛使用了各种通常称为业务流程模型的方法。业务流程建模鼓励统一记录谁生成了什么信息、产品和服务;为谁;如何;为什么;有什么授权。然而,没有任何已知的业务流程模型能够描述风险源:即业务流程中可能出现的错误。本文的目标是演示将风险识别集成到单个现有的业务流程建模方法中。因此,本文开发了功能(IDEF)建模的集成定义的扩展,该定义支持描述业务过程中编程风险的来源。这在规划和规划每年15亿美元公路建设的应用中得到了证明。现有的方法支持识别风险来源,如层次全息建模(HHM)和失效模式、影响和临界分析(FMECA)。本文的结果将强调在IDEF和其他类型的业务流程建模中明确引入风险来源的重要性。©2006 Wiley期刊公司系统工程9:187 - 198,2006
A variety of methodologies commonly known as business process models are widespread in systems engineering and diverse technology systems. Business process modeling encourages uniform documentation of who generates what information, products, services; for whom; how; and why; and with what authorization. However, no known business process models have the capability to describe sources of risk: that is, what can go wrong in the business process. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the integration of risk identification into a single existing methodology of business process modeling. The paper thus develops an extension of the integrated definition for function (IDEF) modeling that supports describing sources of programmatic risk in business processes. This is demonstrated in an application to planning and programming $1.5 billion per year of highway construction. Identifying the sources of risk is supported by existing methodologies such as hierarchical holographic modeling (HHM) and failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). The results of this paper will emphasize the importance of explicitly introducing the sources of risk in IDEF and other types of business process modeling. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 9: 187–198, 2006