Dualization and subjective employment insecurity: Explaining the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers across 23 European countries
Dualization and subjective employment insecurity: Explaining the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers across 23 European countries
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0143831x16656411
复制
发表时间：
2019-08-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Chung, Heejung
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chung, Heejung
二元化理论认为，某些制度导致了劳动力市场的二元化，但制度如何加深内部人与外部人之间的主观不安全感鸿沟尚未得到研究。本文使用2008/2009年23个欧洲国家的数据来研究这个问题。研究结果表明，不同国家的常工和临时工的主观就业不安全感差异显著。社团主义国家拥有更强大的工会，在永久工人和临时工之间存在更大的主观不安全感鸿沟。然而，这是因为长期工人在这些国家感到更安全，而不是因为临时工更容易感到不安全。
Dualization theory posits that certain institutions cause dualization in the labour market, yet how institutions deepen the subjective insecurity divide between insiders and outsiders has not been examined. This article examines this question using data from 23 European countries in 2008/2009. Results show that the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers varies significantly across different countries. Corporatist countries, with stronger unions, have larger subjective insecurity divides between permanent and temporary workers. However, this is because permanent workers feel more secure in these countries rather than because temporary workers are more exposed to feelings of insecurity.