From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory
From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory
复制标题
从机制到美德：评估助推理论
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. van der Heijden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Kosters;J. van der Heijden
自从塞勒和桑斯坦出版了他们有影响力的《助推》一书以来，这本书和它所提出的理论受到了极大的赞扬和反对。推动理论，更具体地说，推动可能被认为是一种额外的策略，为已经丰富的治理工具箱提供了一些新颖的工具。但它的价值是什么？目前关于推动理论的争论往往是高度规范性的或意识形态驱动的，对理论的更实际的方面关注有限。轻推作为一种理论和实践是否可以评估，如果可以，如何评估？是否有确凿的证据表明推动其他治理干预措施取得了成功？什么才算是轻推成功？哪些数据和评估技术可以帮助评估个案之外的推动？本文试图探讨这些问题。
Ever since Thaler and Sunstein published their influential book Nudge, the book and the theory it presents have received great praise and opposition. Nudge theory, and more particularly, nudging may be considered an additional strategy providing some novel instruments to the already rich governance toolbox. But what is its value? The current debates on Nudge theory are often highly normative or ideologically driven and pay limited attention to more practical aspects of the theory. Is nudging evaluable as a theory and a practice, and if so how? Is there solid evidence available of nudge success over other governance interventions? What is to be considered a nudge success? What data and evaluative techniques may assist in evaluating nudging beyond individual cases? The current article seeks to explore these questions.
利用反馈来改善环境结果：食物浪费计划的随机对照试验
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Nomura H
通讯作者：
Nomura H