The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy
The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy
复制标题
牛津哲学词典
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-0149.1996.tb02546.x
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Macintyre
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Macintyre
这两本书将在未来的许多年里被查阅。当然，评审员的任务之一必须是识别它们的缺陷和局限性。但注意这些不应该被允许减少非常高的赞誉，由于罗伯特奥迪作为编辑和西蒙布莱克本作为作者。在令人惊讶的程度上，它们并没有相互竞争，因为这两套书皮的作者会让我们相信：“最全面和权威的英语单卷哲学词典，”剑桥的喉舌说奥迪的书。“最权威和最新的哲学词典可在一个单一的卷，说：”牛津的布莱克本的。他们不可能都是正确的，但在相同的愚蠢，这是非常英国痴迷排名书籍，人，
Both of these books will be consulted for many years to come. One of the tasks of a reviewer must of course be to identifir their defects and limitations. But attention to these should not be allowed to diminish the very high praise due to Robert Audi as editor and Simon Blackburn as author. To a surprising extent they are not in competition with one another, as the writers of the two sets of dustjacket copy would have us believe:“the most comprehensive and authoritative one-volume dictionary of philosophy available in English,” says Cambridge’s mouthpiece about Audi’s book.“The most authoritative and up-to-date dictionary of philosophy available in a single volume,” says Oxford’s about Blackburn’s. They cannot both be right, but share in the same silliness, that very English obsession with ranking books, people, and