Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures
Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.002
复制
发表时间：
2013-12-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Alvarez, Juan M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Church, A. Timothy;Katigbak, Marcia S.;Alvarez, Juan M.
本文采用密度分布和情境-行为两种经验抽样方法研究了自我概念和日常人格状态及影响的个体变异。在所有七个文化样本中，个体内部变异性是实质性的，自我概念和人格状态变异性表现出适度的收敛。在这种情况下，感知需求满足适度预测了人格和情感状态的可变性。密度分布法和情境-行为法在识别变异个体方面具有中等收敛性，但两种方法的文化差异模式存在差异。与文化心理学的观点相反，个体内部变异性的文化差异并不总是对应于个人主义-集体主义、辩证法或紧密性的文化差异。(C) 2013爱思唯尔公司版权所有。
Within-individual variability in self-concepts and everyday personality states and affects was investigated in two experience sampling studies using density distribution and situation-behavior approaches. In all seven cultures sampled, within-individual variability was substantial and self-concept and personality state variability exhibited moderate convergence. Variability in personality and affect states was moderately predicted by perceived need satisfaction in the situations. The density distribution and situation-behavior approaches were moderately convergent in identifying the most variable individuals, but the pattern of cultural differences differed in the two methods. Contrary to cultural psychology perspectives, cultural differences in within-individual variability did not consistently correspond to cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, dialecticism, or tightness. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.