VALIDATION OF 2 RUNNING TESTS AS ESTIMATES OF MAXIMAL AEROBIC POWER IN CHILDREN
VALIDATION OF 2 RUNNING TESTS AS ESTIMATES OF MAXIMAL AEROBIC POWER IN CHILDREN
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/bf00421645
复制
发表时间：
1986-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
KEMPER, HCG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
VANMECHELEN, W;HLOBIL, H;KEMPER, HCG
为了验证Leger和Lambert（1982）的“最大多级20米往返跑测试”（20-MST）作为最大有氧功率的估计值（），并将该测试的结果与6分钟耐力跑的结果进行比较，82名受试者被要求进行20米往返跑测试。（41名男孩和41名女孩），年龄12-14岁，进行20-MST和6分钟耐力跑，20-MST是一项最大跑步测试，从8.0 km · h-1的跑步速度开始，其每分钟增加一次，并且其中步速由音频信号设定。进行测试，一个运行20米的课程来回。测试结果表示为“palier”（1 palier约为1分钟）。20-MST的平均结果为，男孩为8.0 palier（± 1.7），女孩为6.4 palier（± 1.5）。6分钟耐力跑的平均成绩为男孩1264.4米（± 160.8），女孩1103.9米（± 144.7）。男孩平均为53.2 ml · kg-1· min-1（± 5.4），女孩为44.1（± 4.8）ml · kg-1· min-1。与20-MST的相关系数，男生为0.68（± 3.9），女生为0.69（± 3.4），男女均为0.76（± 4.4）;与6 min耐力跑的相关系数，男生为0.51（± 4.6），女生为0.45（± 4.3），男女均为0.63（± 5.3）。结果表明，20-MST是一种较好的评价最大有氧能力的工具。虽然20-MST与6 min耐力跑的有效性差异不显著（p>0.05），但从实用性考虑，在体育教学中使用20-MST应优于6 min耐力跑。
In order to validate the “Maximal Multistage 20 Meter Shuttle Run Test” by Leger and Lambert (1982) (20-MST) as an estimate of maximal aerobic power () and to compare the results of this test with the results of a 6 min endurance run, 82 subjects (41 boys and 41 girls) aged 12–14 performed the 20-MST and the 6 min endurance run, and had theirdirectly measured during maximal treadmill running.The 20-MST is a maximal running test starting at a running speed of 8.0 km · h−1, which is increased every minute and in which the pace is set by an audio signal. Performing the test, one runs a 20-meter course back and forth. The test result is expressed as “palier” (one palier is approximately one minute).The mean results of the 20-MST were, for boys, 8.0 palier (± 1.7) and for girls, 6.4 palier (± 1.5). The mean results of the 6 min endurance run were for boys, 1264.4 meters (± 160.8), and for girls, 1103.9 meters (± 144.7). The meanfor boys was 53.2 ml · kg−1· min−1(± 5.4) and for girls, 44.1 (± 4.8) ml · kg−1· min−1. The correlation coefficient betweenand the 20-MST was found to be 0.68 (± 3.9) for boys, 0.69 (± 3.4) for girls and 0.76 (± 4.4) for both sexes, and that ofwith the 6 min endurance run was 0.51 (± 4.6) for boys, 0.45 (± 4.3) for girls and 0.63 (± 5.3) for both sexes. The conclusion is that the 20-MST is a suitable tool for the evaluation of maximal aerobic power. Although the differences in validity between the 20-MST and the 6 minutes endurance run were statistically not significant (p>0.05), for reasons of practicability the 20-MST should be preferred to the 6 minutes endurance run when used in physical education classes.