Decisions of the Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Double Policy Considering Remanufacturing
Decisions of the Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Double Policy Considering Remanufacturing
复制标题
考虑再制造的双重政策下的双渠道供应链决策
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph16030465
复制
发表时间：
2019-02-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Zhang, Ye
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Feng, Dingzhong;Ma, Lei;Zhang, Ye
考虑绿色消费者对再制造产品的偏好，构建了政府不干预、政府再制造补贴政策和碳税政策下的双销售渠道供应链模型。本文讨论了在这两种政策下，企业和政府最优决策的差异。同时，从社会福利最大化的角度分析了绿色消费者对政府最优决策的影响。研究发现，在没有政府干预的情况下，社会福利最低。当绿色消费者比例和环境系数同时处于极端或适度时，碳税政策效果较好。否则，补贴政策更好。碳税政策比补贴政策更能有效控制碳排放。企业和政府应建立利润分享合同，实现双赢。
Considering the preference of green consumers for remanufactured products, a dual-sale-channel supply chain model with government non-intervention, government remanufacturing subsidy policy, and carbon tax policy is constructed, respectively. The difference of the optimal decision between the firm and the government under the two policies is discussed in this paper. Meanwhile, we analyze the influence of green consumers on the government’s optimal decision, based on social welfare maximization. It is found that without government intervention, social welfare is the lowest. The carbon tax policy is better when the proportion of green consumers and the environmental coefficient are extreme or moderate at the same time. Otherwise, the subsidy policy is better. The carbon tax policy is more effective than the subsidy policy in controlling carbon emissions. Profit-sharing contracts should be established by enterprises and governments to achieve win–win results.