Darwin's heterotrophic flagellates

Darwin's heterotrophic flagellates
复制标题

达尔文的异养鞭毛虫

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Patterson
D. Patterson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Lee;S. Brandt;N. Vørs;D. Patterson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要对澳大利亚北领地达尔文沿海潮间带沉积物和表层水样品中的异养鞭毛虫群落进行了调查,以研究海洋异养鞭毛虫的地理分布。从该属中鉴定出72种:Acanthocorbis,Acanthoeca,Actinomonas,Amastigomonas,Ancyromonas,Anisonema,Apheloecion,Bicosoeca,Bicosta,Bodo,Bordnamonas,Caecitellus,Cafeteria,Calliacantha,Calotheca,Campyloacantha,Carpediemonas,Ciliopkrys,Cosmoeca,Crucispina,Diaphanoeca,Dinema,Diplotheca,Do-peca,Goniomonas,Heteronema,Jenningsia,Kiitohsia,Massisteria,Metopion,Metromonas,Ministeria,Nannoeca,背管单胞菌属、副囊单胞菌属、悬单胞菌属、透囊单胞菌属、瓣单胞菌属、扁侧单胞菌属、侧耳单胞菌属、Ploeotia属、原盾属、假身单胞菌属、假叶螨属、喙身单胞菌属、喙虫属、Salpingoeca、Stephanoeca和Telonema。本文报道了两个新种,即相似透囊单胞菌(Percolomonassimilis)和杏仁核单胞菌(Ploeotiamygdala)。社区结构进行了比较,从世界各地的其他网站使用PRIMER包。物种列表与澳大利亚其他网站和世界各地可比网站生成的列表相对应。没有证据表明这个社区的特有性。
Abstract The communities of heterotrophic flagellates from intertidal sediments and from samples of surface water collected at coastal sites in Darwin (Northern Territory, Australia) were surveyed as part of a study on the geographic distribution of marine heterotrophic flagellates. Seventy two species were identified from the genera: Acanthocorbis, Acanthoeca, Actinomonas, Amastigomonas, Ancyromonas, Anisonema, Apheloecion, Bicosoeca, Bicosta, Bodo, Bordnamonas, Caecitellus, Cafeteria, Calliacantha, Calotheca, Campyloacantha, Carpediemonas, Ciliopkrys, Cosmoeca, Crucispina, Diaphanoeca, Dinema, Diplotheca, Do-Hum, Goniomonas, Heteronema, Jenningsia, Kiitohsia, Massisteria, Metopion, Metromonas, Ministeria, Nannoeca, Notosolenus, Paraphysomonas, Pendulomonas, Percolomonas, Petalomonas, Platypleura, Pleurasiga, Ploeotia, Protaspis, Pseudobodo, Pseudophyllomitus, Rhynchobodo, Rhynchomonas, Rhynchopus, Salpingoeca, Stephanoeca and Telonema. Two new species, Percolomonas similis and Ploeotia amygdala, are reported. The community structure was compared with those from other sites world-wide using the PRIMER package. The species lists correspond well with lists generated from other Australian sites and from comparable sites worldwide. There is no evidence from this study of endemism of this community.