Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study
Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.026
复制
发表时间:
2012-11-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Ghezzi, Fabio
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Serati, Maurizio;Siesto, Gabriele;Ghezzi, Fabio
Objective: To evaluate the risk factors potentially involved in the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) recurrence after cervical conization in a long-term follow-up period.Study design: Consecutive patients with histologically proven CIN who had undergone either cold knife conization or a loop electrosurgical excision procedure were enrolled and scheduled for serial follow-up examinations over a 10-year period. Data were stored in a digital database. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors for recurrence.Results: Between January 1999 and December 2009, 282 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final statistical analysis. After a median follow-up of 26.7 months (range 6-100), 64 (22.7%) women developed histologically confirmed recurrence. The 2-year recurrence-free survival was 83.7% and 66.7% for women with negative and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.008). The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75.4% and 50.3% for patients with negative and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.0004). Positive surgical margin was the most important independent predictor of recurrence [HR 2.5 (95%CI 1.5-4.5), p = 0.0007: Wald 11.338]. After multinomial logistic regression the indication for conization based on persistent CIN1 was the only independent predictor for negative margin [OR 0.3 (95%CI 0.1-0.7), p = 0.008].Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the surgical margin status represents the most important predictor for CIN recurrence after conization. After excisional therapy, close follow-up is mandatory for the early detection of recurrent disease. The identification of risk factors for recurrence may guide clinical decision-making on expectant management versus re-intervention. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.