Exploratory Causal Analysis of Open Data: Explanation Generation and Confounder Identification
Exploratory Causal Analysis of Open Data: Explanation Generation and Confounder Identification
复制标题
开放数据的探索性因果分析:解释生成和混杂因素识别
DOI:
10.20965/jaciii.2020.p0142
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Kurihara
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jing Song;S. Oyama;M. Kurihara
Open data are becoming increasingly available in various domains, and many organizations rely on making decisions according to data. Such decision making requires care to distinguish between correlations and causal relationships. Among data analysis tasks, causal relationship analysis is especially complex because of unobserved confounders. For example, to correctly analyze the causal relationship between two variables, the possible confounding effect of a third variable should be considered. In the open-data environment, however, it is difficult to consider all possible confounders in advance. In this paper, we propose a framework for exploratory causal analysis of open data, in which possible confounding variables are collected and incrementally tested from a large volume of open data. To the extent of the authors’ knowledge, no framework has been proposed to incorporate data for possible confounders in causal analysis process. This paper shows an original way to expand causal structures and generate reasonable causal relationships. The proposed framework accounts for the effect of possible confounding in causal analysis by first using a crowdsourcing platform to collect explanations of the correlation between variables. Keywords are then extracted using natural language processing methods. The framework searches the related open data according to the extracted keywords. Finally, the collected explanations are tested using several automated causal analysis methods. We conducted experiments using open data from the World Bank and the Japanese government. The experimental results confirmed that the proposed framework enables causal analysis while considering the effects of possible confounders.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Lei Duan;Satoshi Oyama;Haruhiko Sato;and Masahito Kurihara
通讯作者:
and Masahito Kurihara
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Hoyer, Patrik O.;Shimizu, Shohei;Palviainen, Markus
通讯作者:
Palviainen, Markus