Doing Theology (and Philosophy) in the First Person: Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibeta
Doing Theology (and Philosophy) in the First Person: Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibeta
复制标题
以第一人称进行神学（和哲学）：根特的亨利的 Quodlibeta
DOI：
10.1163/9789047404149_007
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Schabel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Schabel
对马丁·格拉曼来说，《根特的亨利》的十五部著作代表了“ das wertvollste Quodlibetalienwerk des Scholastik ”我不愿把这种至高无上的地位赋予它们，但我承认，亨利的伪自由主义问题为这种特殊的文学流派提供了一个特别重要的例子。格洛里厄则毫不怀疑地认为，亨利的《现状》是“制宪的政党和重要的生产活动”。这种评价或许也应该有所缓和；或许更正确的说法是，对亨利本人来说，所谓的“双自由”问题和普通问题一样重要。然而，除了这些微妙之处之外，今天——当大约一半的Quodlibeta最终在一个新的关键版本中可用时——
For Martin Grabmann the fifteen Quodlibeta of Henry of Ghent represent “das wertvollste Quodlibetalienwerk des Scholastik.” 1 I would hesitate to assign them such supremacy, but I will concede that Henry’s quodlibetal questions offer a particularly significant example of this specific literary genre. Glorieux, for his part, had no doubts in maintaining that Henry’s Quodlibeta “constituent la partie la plus importante de sa production littéraire.” 2 This evaluation, too, should perhaps be attenuated; it might be more correct to say that for Henry himself the quodlibetal questions were just as important as the ordinary ones. Yet beyond such subtleties, today—when about half of the Quodlibeta are finally available in a new critical edition3—