From infinitely divisible representations to cohomological rigidity
From infinitely divisible representations to cohomological rigidity
复制标题
从无限可分表示到上同调刚性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Schmidt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Schmidt
1968年初在维也纳完成了关于均匀分布理论中一些问题的博士学位后，我觉得需要改变数学方向，开始阅读K.R.Parthasarathy的著作《度量空间上的概率测量》([20])，这本书给我留下了深刻的印象，我决定去曼彻斯特与Parthasarathy一起工作。当我最终在1969年到达那里时，我发现帕塔--我学会了这样称呼他--已经进入了量子力学和量子场论的数学基础，并且正在研究连续张量积和经典中心极限定理之间的某些联系。他开始了一项新的数学探索，再加上他非常愿意分享问题和想法，这让我在到达后立即开始与他合作解决这些问题。这对我来说是一段快乐的时光：他和Shyama的善良、热情和好客(以及Shyama火热的印度菜)都为我在曼彻斯特逗留的美好记忆做出了贡献。令我遗憾的是，帕萨和他的家人在1970年回到了印度，我后来去了伦敦的贝德福德学院。1972年，Partha回到英国，在Warwick呆了一段时间，我和他一起在那里呆了一段时间，继续我们早期关于连续张量积和中心极限定理的非对易版本的主题的合作(参见。[26]))。
After completing my Ph.D. on some problems in the theory of uniform distribution in Vienna in early 1968 I felt in need of a change of mathematical direction and started reading K.R. Parthasarathy’s book Probability measures on metric spaces ([20]), which impressed me so much that I decided to go to Manchester and work with Parthasarathy. When I eventually arrived there in 1969 I discovered that Partha—as I learned to call him—had moved on to the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and was working on certain connections between continuous tensor products and classical central limit theorems. The fact that he was starting on a new mathematical venture, combined with his extraordinary willingness to share problems and ideas, allowed me to begin working with him on these problems immediately after my arrival. It was a happy time for me: his and Shyama’s kindness, warmth and hospitality (as well as Shyama’s fiery Indian cooking) all contributed to the fond memories I still have of my stay in Manchester. Much to my regret Partha and his family went back to India in 1970, and I went on to Bedford College in London. In 1972 Partha came back to England to spend some time at Warwick and I joined him there for a while continuing our earlier collaboration on topics related to continuous tensor products and noncommutative versions of the central limit theorem (cf. [26]).