Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.pan.2013.01.013
复制
发表时间:
2013-05-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Zhang, Taiping
Zhang, Taiping
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen, Ge;Liu, Shanglong;Zhang, Taiping

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景与目的:EUS-FNA在许多中心已广泛应用于临床。本荟萃分析旨在研究EUS-FNA在胰腺癌中的诊断作用。方法:对EUS-FNA在胰腺癌诊断中的准确性进行综述。采用随机效应模型汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。构建了一个汇总的接收者工作特征(SROC)来总结总体测试性能。结果:31篇文章符合meta分析。EUS-FNA诊断胰腺癌的综合敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR分别为0.89 (95%CI: 0.88 ~ 0.90)、0.96 (95%CI: 0.95 ~ 0.97)、16.88 (95%CI: 10.63 ~ 26.79)、0.13 (95%CI: 0.10 ~ 0.16)、150.80 (95%CI: 95.94 ~ 237.03)。在前瞻性研究的亚组荟萃分析中,合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR和DOR分别为0.91 (95%CI: 0.90-0.93)、0.94 (95%CI: 0.91-0.96)、11.19 (95%CI: 6.36-19.69)、0.10 (95%CI: 0.07-0.15)和125.22(62.37-251.41)。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.97,总体准确度较好。结论:EUS-FNA鉴别胰腺癌具有较高的敏感性和特异性。此外,它也是一种安全的诊断方式,并发症少。版权所有,IAP和EPC。由爱思唯尔印度出版,爱思唯尔印度有限公司的一个部门。版权所有。
Background and objective: EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesion has been put into clinical use widely in many centers. The present meta-analysis was conducted to study the diagnostic role of EUS-FNA in pancreatic cancer.Methods: A comprehensive review of study on the precision of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) was constructed to summarize the overall test performance.Results: Thirty-one articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 0.89 (95%CI: 0.88-0.90), 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.97), 16.88 (95%CI: 10.63-26.79), 0.13 (95%CI: 0.10-0.16) and 150.80 (95%CI: 95.94-237.03) respectively. In subgroup meta-analysis of the prospective studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.90-0.93), 0.94 (95%CI: 0.91-0.96), 11.19 (95%CI: 6.36-19.69), 0.10 (95%CI: 0.07-0.15) and 125.22 (62.37-251.41). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97, indicating a good performance of overall accuracy.Conclusion: EUS-FNA has the high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating pancreatic cancer. Moreover, it is also a safe diagnostic modality with little complications. Copyright (C) 2013, IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.