Historical, Archaeology, Capitalism
Historical, Archaeology, Capitalism
复制标题
历史、考古学、资本主义
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_9
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Matthew H. Johnson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthew H. Johnson
在本文中，我想支持本书的中心主旨，即呼吁对资本主义进行历史考古学。撰写这样的考古学是一项复杂而困难的任务，我试图探讨这样的呼吁所提出的一些普遍问题，这些问题在我自己的工作和此处发表的论文中都进行了探讨。我的论文将集中评论几个不同但明显相关的问题：空间、时间、背景、物质文化和政治。这些问题的各个方面以前已经在现代世界考古学的背景下提出过（Orser 1996），但我想在这里指出，这些概念不仅是资本主义考古学的核心，它们本身也是所有领域和地方考古学实践的核心，因此可以被视为整个考古学的基本组成部分。因此，资本主义考古学不仅仅是更传统的考古学问题的“分支”；它处于整体意义上的考古学学科的核心。我将在结论中进一步讨论历史考古学和其他考古学之间的关系。
In this paper I want to support the central thrust of this volume, namely the call for a historical archaeology of capitalism. Writing such an archaeology is a complex and difficult task, and I seek to explore some of the general problems raised by such a call as explored both in my own work and in the papers published here. My paper will concentrate its comments on several distinct, but clearly related, issues: space, time, context, material culture, and politics. Aspects of these issues have been raised before in the context of an archaeology of the modern world (Orser 1996), but I want to argue here that such concepts are not only central to an archaeology of capitalism, they are themselves central to the practice of archaeology in all areas and places, and as such can be considered the basic building blocks of archaeology as a whole. An archaeology of capitalism is, consequently, much more than an “offshoot” of more traditional archaeological concerns; it is situated at the core of the discipline of archaeology conceived in a holistic sense. I will discuss this relationship between historical and other archaeologies further in the conclusions.