Response to “Letter to the Editor regarding the report entitled Urinary sodium/potassium ratio as a screening tool for hyperaldosteronism in men with hypertension”
Response to “Letter to the Editor regarding the report entitled Urinary sodium/potassium ratio as a screening tool for hyperaldosteronism in men with hypertension”
复制标题
回应“关于题为尿钠/钾比作为高血压男性醛固酮增多症筛查工具的报告的致编辑的信”
DOI:
10.1038/s41440-021-00834-8
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Ueshima Hirotsugu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Segawa Hiroyoshi;Higashi Akane;Yoshii Kengo;Iwahori Toshiyuki;Ueshima Hirotsugu
We would like to thank you for the opportunity to respond to the issues raised in the letter related to our report and for providing detailed information to address these concerns. In the letter, the author noted concerns regarding a lower negative likelihood test not being employed during our evaluation of hyperaldosteronism screening [1]. We agree that, in general, a lower negative likelihood test can be effectively employed to avoid missing the detection of a disease.In our study results, the possibility of hyperaldosteronism was low if the second morning urine Na/K ratio (SMU Na/K) was higher than 3.0 [2]. However, it is also important to use a screening tool to detect subjects for whom detailed examinations are appropriate. The probability of hyperaldosteronism is only 14.7%, even if a subject, s SMU Na/K is less than 3.0 (Table 3 in [2]. A larger number of people may reach a cutoff point set at 3.0 without either a special diet or strict dietary control since the mean urinary Na/K ratio of people under the self-monitoring intervention reached 3.2 [3]. Thus, setting the cutoff point at 3.0 may lead to many unnecessary detailed examinations. It is reasonable to infer that patients showing a low urinary Na/K should be identified
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
T. Shimosawa
通讯作者:
T. Shimosawa