UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons

UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons
复制标题

英国奥委会好吗?

DOI:
10.1093/pan/mpl009
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
I. McLean
I. McLean
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Spirling;I. McLean

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

普尔(2000),二元选择数据的非参数展开。政治分析(8:21 - 37)二元数据的非参数最优分类程序在应用于现代下议院时产生了误导性的秩排序。通过模拟和定性证据,我们表明问题源于英国(威斯敏斯特)议会政治的政府与反对派的性质以及其中所涉及的战略投票。我们建议政治学家在解释这些技术的结果时,认真考虑立法机构中的战略投票。
Poole's (2000, Non-parametric unfolding of binary choice data. Political Analysis 8:211–37) nonparametric Optimal Classification procedure for binary data produces misleading rank orderings when applied to the modern House of Commons. With simulations and qualitative evidence, we show that the problem arises from the government-versus-opposition nature of British (Westminster) parliamentary politics and the strategic voting that is entailed therein. We suggest that political scientists think seriously about strategic voting in legislatures when interpreting results from such techniques.