On the patholog of echographia
On the patholog of echographia
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/brain/47.4.417
复制
发表时间：
1924-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
14.5
通讯作者：
Pick, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pick, A
在最近关于失语症的讨论中，有一种观点认为，这个问题的纯心理方面应该被看作是次要的，暂时搁置一边，直到更紧迫的临床和解剖问题得到解决。因此，如果我不顾这一格言，把一个不出现本地化问题的罕见情况作为我的主题，并以似乎不必要的微小细节来讨论它，那么就可能需要一些理由。我愿意认为，这个理由是基于这样的考虑：只有这样，我们才有希望获得对更简单和更常见过程的洞察力;在这一点上，我与W是一致的。詹姆斯说：“新发现的伟大领域总是未分类的剩余物。“1900年在巴黎举行的国际大会上，我提请注意一种失语症，通过与回声言语症的类比，我称之为回声描记症。当时其他人似乎还不知道这种症状，特别是我的法国同事，他们认为这是一种新的症状。我在巴黎自己凭记忆写的论文中说，贝特曼[1]在巴黎的一个案例中看到了类似的情况。但这是不正确的;贝特曼在描述了瓦辛的回声言语症病例后，提到了另一个病例，其中一名失语症患者用书面回应了对她所说的一切。贝特曼通过假设听觉中心的印象“刺激”了书写中心来解释这一点。
IN recent discussions on aphasia, the view has been expressed that the purely psychological aspect of the subject should be looked upon as of subsidiary importance and laid aside for the present until more pressing clinical and anatomical problems have been solved. Some justification may be necessary therefore, if, in spite of this dictum, I take for my subject a rare condition in which the question of localization does not arise and discuss it in what may appear to be unnecessarily minute detail. This justification, I like to think, is found in the consideration that it is only in this way we can hope to obtain an insight into simpler and more usual processes; in this I am at one with W. James who said that" the great field of new discoveries is always the unclassified residuum." At the International Congress held at Paris in 1900, 1 drew attention to an aphasic disturbance which, by analogy with echolalia, I called echographia [9]. The symptoms seemed to be unknown to others at that time, my French colleagues in particular accepting it as something quite new. In my paper, which was written from memory in Paris itself, I stated that Bateman [1] had seen something similar in a case of Voisin's in Paris. But this is not correct; Bateman, after describing Voisin's case of echolalia, mentions another case in which an aphasic patient echoed in writing everything that was said to her. Bateman explains this by assuming that the impressions on the auditory centre" stimulated" the writing centre.