12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations
12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0022034510376071
复制
发表时间：
2010-10-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Huysmans, M. -C. D. N. J. M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Opdam, N. J. M.;Bronkhorst, E. M.;Huysmans, M. -C. D. N. J. M.
关于大汞合金和复合修复体的长期临床生存的信息仍然缺乏。这项回顾性研究比较了三面和四面/五面汞合金和复合修复体的寿命与患者龋齿风险的关系。来自普通诊所的患者记录用于数据收集。我们评估了 1949 个大型 II 类修复体（1202 个汞合金/747 个复合材料）。记录放置、更换和失败的日期，并评估患者的龋齿风险。生存率根据 Kaplan-Meier 统计数据计算。 12 年后，293 个汞合金修复体和 114 个复合修复体失败了。大型复合修复体在合并人群和低风险组中显示出更高的生存率。对于高危患者的三面修复体，汞合金显示出更好的生存率。
Information about the long-term clinical survival of large amalgam and composite restorations is still lacking. This retrospective study compares the longevity of three-and four-/five-surface amalgam and composite restorations relative to patients' caries risk. Patient records from a general practice were used for data collection. We evaluated 1949 large class II restorations (1202 amalgam/747 composite). Dates of placement, replacement, and failure were recorded, and caries risk of patients was assessed. Survival was calculated from Kaplan-Meier statistics. After 12 years, 293 amalgam and 114 composite restorations had failed. Large composite restorations showed a higher survival in the combined population and in the low-risk group. For three-surface restorations in high-risk patients, amalgam showed better survival.