Test of a potential link between analytic and nonanalytic category learning and automatic, effortful processing.

Test of a potential link between analytic and nonanalytic category learning and automatic, effortful processing.
复制标题

测试分析性和非分析性类别学习与自动、努力的处理之间的潜在联系。

DOI:
10.1006/brcg.2001.1288
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
Brain and cognition.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Smith,DJ
Smith,DJ
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tracy,JI;Pinsk,M;Helverson,J;Urban,G;Dietz,T;Smith,DJ

文献摘要

相似文献

自动和努力的处理和非分析和分析类别学习之间的联系进行了评估,在29名大学生的样本使用陈述性记忆,语义类别搜索,和伪词分类任务。自动和努力的处理措施被假设为与非分析和分析分类,分别。结果表明,相反的预测强标准属性(分析)响应的pseudoword分类任务与强大的自动,内隐记忆编码的发生频率的信息。数据进行了讨论的可能性,标准属性类别的知识,一旦建立,可能会表示很少的注意力资源。这些数据表明,注意力资源的要求,即使是相同的刺激和任务,不同的类别规则系统的使用。此外,自动性出现的熟悉与分析类别的例子是非常不同的自动性产生的广泛实践的语义类别搜索任务。这些数据不支持任何简单的映射的分析和非分析形式的类别学习到自动和努力的处理二分法和挑战简单的模型,大脑不对称的程序。
The link between automatic and effortful processing and nonanalytic and analytic category learning was evaluated in a sample of 29 college undergraduates using declarative memory, semantic category search, and pseudoword categorization tasks. Automatic and effortful processing measures were hypothesized to be associated with nonanalytic and analytic categorization, respectively. Results suggested that contrary to prediction strong criterion-attribute (analytic) responding on the pseudoword categorization task was associated with strong automatic, implicit memory encoding of frequency-of-occurrence information. Data are discussed in terms of the possibility that criterion-attribute category knowledge, once established, may be expressed with few attentional resources. The data indicate that attention resource requirements, even for the same stimuli and task, vary depending on the category rule system utilized. Also, the automaticity emerging from familiarity with analytic category exemplars is very different from the automaticity arising from extensive practice on a semantic category search task. The data do not support any simple mapping of analytic and nonanalytic forms of category learning onto the automatic and effortful processing dichotomy and challenge simple models of brain asymmetries for such procedures.