Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions: Part B. Coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions

Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions: Part B. Coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.001
复制
发表时间:
2005-04
影响因子:
7.8
通讯作者:
C. Forza;F. Salvador;M. Rungtusanatham
C. Forza;F. Salvador;M. Rungtusanatham
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Forza;F. Salvador;M. Rungtusanatham

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对A部分的补充,在之前的问题中出现,协调产品设计,流程设计和供应链设计决策。第二部分:协调方法、权衡和未来的研究方向,介绍了属于本期特刊的另外四篇论文。这四篇论文试图提供以下两个问题的答案:“什么机制允许产品设计、制造过程设计和供应链设计决策协调?”和“为什么关于产品设计、制造过程设计和供应链设计的决策应该协调?”在B部分中编写的四篇论文中的每一篇都提供了一种跨产品设计、制造过程设计和供应链设计领域协调决策的方法。所提出的协调机制包括从基于网络的建模方法到评估产品架构的评估程序,再到将相关供应商整合到新产品开发(NPD)过程中,再到目标规划建模方法。事实上,B部分的第四篇论文部署了所建议的目标规划建模方法,以识别和形式化跨三个领域的决策之间的潜在权衡。B部分通过确定未来的研究机会来完成特刊,超出了本特刊关于协调产品设计、工艺设计和供应链设计决策的A部分和B部分的七篇论文中强调的研究机会。
Complementing Part A which appeared in an earlier issue,Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions. Part B. coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directionsintroduces four additional papers that belong to this special issue. These four papers seek to provide answers to the following two questions: “What mechanisms allow product design, manufacturing process design, and supply chain design decisions to be coordinated?” and “Why should decisions with respect to product design, manufacturing process design, and supply chain design be coordinated?” Each of the four papers compiled in Part B provides, foremost, an approach to coordinate decisions across the domains of product design, manufacturing process design, and supply chain design. The proposed coordinating mechanisms range from a network‐based modeling approach to an assessment procedure for evaluating product architectures to the integration of relevant suppliers into the new product development (NPD) process to a goal programming modeling approach. The fourth paper in Part B, in fact, deploys the proposed goal programming modeling approach to identify and formalize the potential tradeoffs among decisions across the three domains. Part B completes the special issue by identifying future research opportunities, beyond those highlighted within the seven papers that form Part A and Part B of this special issue onCoordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions.