Relational Humility: Conceptualizing and Measuring Humility as a Personality Judgment

Relational Humility: Conceptualizing and Measuring Humility as a Personality Judgment
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/00223891.2011.558871
复制
发表时间:
2011-01-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Emmons, Robert A.
Emmons, Robert A.
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davis, Don E.;Hook, Joshua N.;Emmons, Robert A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

由于测量问题,谦卑的研究进展缓慢。我们描述了一个关系谦卑的模型,它将谦卑概念化为一种人格判断。在这组5项研究中,我们开发了16项关系谦卑量表(RHS),并为理论模型提供了初步证据。在研究1 (N = 300)中,我们开发了RHS及其子量表:全球谦卑、优越感和准确的自我观。在研究2中,我们在一个独立样本(N = 196)中确认了量表的因子结构。在研究3中,我们使用实验设计(N = 200)提供了支持结构效度的初步证据。在研究4 (N = 150)中,我们通过考察谦卑与同理心、宽恕和其他美德之间的关系,为构建效度提供了额外的证据。在研究5 (N = 163)中,我们引用了与HEXACO-PI的诚实-谦卑子量表相比,RHS的判别效度和增量效度的证据(Lee Ashton, 2004)。
The study of humility has progressed slowly due to measurement problems. We describe a model of relational humility that conceptualizes humility as a personality judgment. In this set of 5 studies, we developed the 16-item Relational Humility Scale (RHS) and offered initial evidence for the theoretical model. In Study 1 (N = 300), we developed the RHS and its subscalesGlobal Humility, Superiority, and Accurate View of Self. In Study 2, we confirmed the factor structure of the scale in an independent sample (N = 196). In Study 3, we provided initial evidence supporting construct validity using an experimental design (N = 200). In Study 4 (N = 150), we provided additional evidence of construct validity by examining the relationships between humility and empathy, forgiveness, and other virtues. In Study 5 (N = 163), we adduced evidence of discriminant and incremental validity of the RHS compared with the Honesty-Humility subscale of the HEXACO-PI (Lee Ashton, 2004).