Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being.

Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0003122418823184
复制
发表时间:
2019-02-01
影响因子:
9.1
通讯作者:
Harknett K
Harknett K
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schneider D;Harknett K

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对不稳定工作及其后果的研究,压倒性地集中在早熟的经济层面,其缩影是低工资。但不稳定工作的增加也涉及到时间维度的重大转变,以至于许多工人现在的工作时间安排出现了例行的不稳定。这种暂时的不稳定性是风险从企业转移到工人身上的一种根本且未得到充分认识的表现。然而,由于缺乏合适的现有数据,无法调查不稳定的调度做法是如何影响工人的健康和福祉的。我们使用一种创新的方法从美国劳动力中经过战略选择的一大部分收集调查数据:服务业的小时工。这些数据表明,暴露在日常工作时间表的不稳定中与心理困扰、睡眠质量差和不快乐有关。低工资也与这些结果有关,但不稳定和不可预测的时间表与这些结果的关联要强得多。不稳定的作息时间在一定程度上通过家庭经济不安全的中介影响影响工人的幸福感,但这种联系的更大比例是由工作与生活冲突驱动的。工作的时间维度是早产体验的核心,也是幸福的重要社会决定因素。
Research on precarious work and its consequences overwhelmingly focuses on the economic dimension of precarity, epitomized by low wages. But the rise in precarious work also involves a major shift in its temporal dimension, such that many workers now experience routine instability in their work schedules. This temporal instability represents a fundamental and under-appreciated manifestation of the risk shift from firms to workers. A lack of suitable existing data, however, has precluded investigation of how precarious scheduling practices affect workers’ health and well-being. We use an innovative approach to collect survey data from a large and strategically selected segment of the U.S. workforce: hourly workers in the service sector. These data reveal that exposure to routine instability in work schedules is associated with psychological distress, poor sleep quality, and unhappiness. Low wages are also associated with these outcomes, but unstable and unpredictable schedules are much more strongly associated. Precarious schedules affect worker well-being in part through the mediating influence of household economic insecurity, yet a much larger proportion of the association is driven by work-life conflict. The temporal dimension of work is central to the experience of precarity and an important social determinant of well-being.
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1259737
发表时间: 2017-01-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Averett, Susan L.;Smith, Julie K.;Wang, Yang
通讯作者: Wang, Yang
DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.4.272
发表时间: 2002-04-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Ala-Mursala, L;Vahtera, J;Pentti, J
通讯作者: Pentti, J
DOI: 10.1177/0002764206286386
发表时间: 2006-05-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Allen, TD;Armstrong, J
通讯作者: Armstrong, J