Thick, thin and thinner patriotisms: is this all there is?
Thick, thin and thinner patriotisms: is this all there is?
复制标题
浓浓的、薄薄的、薄薄的爱国主义：这就是全部吗？
DOI：
10.1093/ojls/gqi045
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Dora Kostakopoulou
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dora Kostakopoulou
在理论上对国家身份的“再造”和在实践中对英国归化规则的改革都无法令人满意地解决不公正排斥的问题，也无法使归化法和公民身份与民主理想更加兼容。这与新爱国主义的话语和国家公民身份的重新配置有内在的局限性这一事实有很大关系。在考察爱国主义的“新”话语的各种阴影时，我认为它是不一致和缺乏说服力的。无论是“共和爱国主义”下的公民民族主义复兴，还是“立宪爱国主义”，抑或“扎根爱国主义”，都未能成功地改变公民身份的民族模式，使其更能适应当代发展和文化多元化。同样，文献中提出的三种公民模式，即后国家公民、跨国公民和多元文化公民，仍然植根于公民民族主义的轨迹。我不是主张放宽入籍要求和随后的公民身份多元化，而是提出了一种论证，即如何通过发展公民登记模式来超越公民身份的国籍模式。通过将这一模式与工党政府在入籍和公民身份领域的改革进行对比，我认为《2002年国籍、移民和庇护法》过于强调社会凝聚力，从而忽视了对社区的归属感是随着社会和政治的融入而发展的，而不是通过入籍仪式和语言能力测试而发展的。
The ‘reinvention’ of nationhood in theory and the reform of British naturalization rules in praxis have been unable to address satisfactorily the issue of unjust exclusion and to make naturalization law and citizenship more compatible with democratic ideals. This has much to do with the fact that the discourse of new patriotism and the reconfiguration of national citizenship have inbuilt limits. In examining the ‘new’ discourse of patriotism in its various shades, I argue that it is inconsistent and unpersuasive. Neither the rehabilitation of civic nationalism under ‘republican patriotism’, nor ‘constitutional patriotism’, nor ‘rooted patriotism’ succeed in transforming the nationality model of citizenship in order to render it more compatible with contemporary developments and with cultural pluralism. Similarly, the three models of citizenship developed by the literature, namely, postnational, transnational and multicultural citizenship remain rooted within the civic nationalist trajectory. Instead of arguing for the liberalization of naturalization requirements and the ensuing pluralization of citizenship, I put forward an argument as to how the nationality model of citizenship might be transcended by developing a model of civic registration. By contrasting this model with the Labour Government’s reforms in the fields of naturalization and citizenship, I argue that the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 places too much emphasis on social cohesion, thereby overlooking that a sense of belonging to community develops with inclusion in society and politics rather than as a result of citizenship ceremonies and language proficiency tests.