Hybrid identity and practices to negotiate belonging: Madrid’s Muslim youth of migrant origin

Hybrid identity and practices to negotiate belonging: Madrid’s Muslim youth of migrant origin
复制标题

混合身份和谈判归属感的实践:马德里的移民穆斯林青年

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
C. Boland
C. Boland
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Boland

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对马德里移民出身的自我认同穆斯林青年进行的定性案例研究试图了解他们如何形成身份,并在归属感中采用真实的文化习俗。这些青年中的大多数来自所谓的“1.5”代和“第二代”,并表达了一种混合或混合的身份:他们将宗教、文化或种族身份的一个或几个方面与对西班牙或马德里的认同结合起来。因此,这些分层和复杂的身份可能表明对居住社区的依恋。混合性也表现在行为上,参与者使用多种语言,以及多样化的文化或宗教习俗。此外,在谈判包容和归属时,有些人主张他们有权表达这些多元身份和从事不同的文化习俗,特别是当这些权利被视为被剥夺时。本文主要认为,参与者利用混合身份来代表自己并找到共同点:他们保持对马德里或西班牙的依恋,以及他们的少数民族身份和不同的文化习俗,或将这些习俗融入他们的社区。委员会还注意到,尽管人们认为他们经历过歧视,但这些人要求加入并尊重个人权利,反映了他们对公民身份的理解是基于参与和承认差异,这就引起了人们对过去或未来公民身份政策和教育的影响的疑问。
A qualitative case study of self-identifying Muslim youth of migrant origin in Madrid sought to understand how they formulated identity and employed real cultural practices in navigating belonging. The majority of these youth drew from the so-called “1.5” and “second” generations, and expressed a hyphenated or hybrid identity: they combined one or several aspects of religious, cultural or ethnic identity alongside an identification with Spain or Madrid. As such, these layered and complex identities could indicate attachment to community of residence. Hybridity was also manifested in behaviours, with participants demonstrating multiple language use, as well as variegated cultural or religious practice. Moreover, in negotiating inclusion and belonging, some argued for their rights to express these plural identities and engage in diverse cultural practices, particularly when such rights were perceived as denied. This paper primarily contends that participants leveraged hybrid identities in representing themselves and finding common ground: they maintained attachments to Madrid or Spain alongside their minority identification and diverse cultural practices, or incorporated these practices in engaging with their communities. It furthermore observes that despite perceived experiences of discrimination, this population’s claims to membership and respect for individual rights reflected an understanding of citizenship based in participation and recognition of difference, raising questions as to the impact of past or future citizenship policy and education.