Group Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Increases Smoke Toxicant Concentration.

Group Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Increases Smoke Toxicant Concentration.
复制标题

集体吸水烟会增加烟雾中有毒物质的浓度。

DOI:
10.1093/ntr/ntv271
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Eissenberg,Thomas
Eissenberg,Thomas
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ramôa,CarolinaP;Shihadeh,Alan;Salman,Rola;Eissenberg,Thomas

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

IntroductionWaterpipe tobacco smoking is a global health concern. Laboratory research has focused on individual waterpipe users while group use is common. This study examined user toxicant exposure and smoke toxicant yield associated with individual and group waterpipe smoking.MethodsTwenty-two pairs of waterpipe smokers used a waterpipe individually and as a dyad. Before and after smoking, blood was sampled and expired carbon monoxide (CO) measured; puff topography was recorded throughout. One participant from each pair was selected randomly and their plasma nicotine and expired air CO concentrations were compared when smoking alone to when smoking as part of a dyad. Recorded puff topography was used to machine-produce smoke that was analyzed for toxicant content.ResultsThere was no difference in mean plasma nicotine concentration when an individual smoked as part of a dyad (mean = 14.9ng/ml; standard error of the mean [SEM] = 3.0) compared to when smoking alone (mean = 10.0ng/ml;SEM= 1.5). An individual smoking as part of as a dyad had, on average, lower CO (mean = 15.8 ppm;SEM= 2.0) compared to when smoking alone (mean= 21.3 ppm;SEM= 2.7). When two participants smoked as a dyad they took, on average, more puffs (mean = 109.8;SEM= 7.6) than a singleton smoker (mean = 77.7;SEM= 8.1) and a shorter interpuff interval (IPI; dyad mean = 23.8 seconds;SEM= 1.9; singleton mean = 40.8 seconds;SEM= 4.8). Higher concentrations of several toxicants were observed in dyad-produced smoke.DiscussionDyad smoking may increase smoke toxicant content, likely due to the dyad’s shorter IPIs and greater puff number. More work is needed to understand if group waterpipe smoking alters the health risks of waterpipe tobacco smoking.ImplicationsThis study is the first to measure toxicants in smoke generated from a waterpipe when used by a dyad. Relative to smoke generated by a singleton, dyad smoke had higher concentration of some toxicants. These differences may be attributed to differences in puffing behavior, specifically the shorter IPI and greater puff number observed in the dyad condition. Relative to singleton smokers, dyad smokers were exposed to less CO, but nicotine exposure did not differ. More work is needed to assess the health effects of inhalation of more toxicant-laden smoke during group waterpipe use.
DOI: 10.1056/nejm198202113060606
发表时间: 1982-01-01
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
CRUMPACKER, CS;SCHNIPPER, LE;LEVIN, MJ
通讯作者: LEVIN, MJ
人干扰素-α 的八个或更多不同染色体基因之一的结构
DOI: --
发表时间: 1980
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
S. Nagata;N. Mantei;C. Weissmann
通讯作者: C. Weissmann
DOI: 10.1084/jem.144.5.1305
发表时间: 1976-11-02
期刊: The Journal of experimental medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
Gresser I;Tovey MG;Bandu ME;Maury C;Brouty-Boyé D
通讯作者: Brouty-Boyé D
DOI: 10.1038/287408a0
发表时间: 1980-01-01
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
ALLEN, G;FANTES, KH
通讯作者: FANTES, KH
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-95448-1_7
发表时间: 1984
期刊: RNA
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
R. Kandolf;P. Hofschneider
通讯作者: P. Hofschneider