Constructing food choice decisions.
Constructing food choice decisions.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s12160-009-9124-5
复制
发表时间：
2009-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bisogni, Carole A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sobal, Jeffery;Bisogni, Carole A
背景：食物选择决策是频繁的、多方面的、情境性的、动态的和复杂的，并导致人们在获取、准备、服务、分发、储存、食用和清理食物的行为。许多学科和领域研究决策。目的：几类理论适用于食品决策，包括社会行为，社会事实和社会定义的观点。每个人都提供了一些见解，但也做出了限制性的假设，无法充分解释食物选择的决定。方法：我们运用建构主义社会定义的观点，归纳建立了一个食物选择过程模型，该模型组织了涉及食物行为的广泛因素和动态。结果：该食物选择过程模型包括：(1)通过过渡、转折点、时间和环境建立食物选择轨迹的生命历程事件和经历；(2)文化理想、个人因素、资源、社会因素和当前环境对食物选择的影响；(3)发展食物选择价值观、协商和平衡价值观、对食物和情况进行分类、形成/修改食物选择策略、脚本和惯例的个人系统。模型的各个部分动态地相互作用，做出食物选择决策，从而导致食物行为。结论：没有单一的理论可以完全解释食物行为的决策。需要多种视角，包括建构主义思维。
BACKGROUND: Food choice decisions are frequent, multifaceted, situational, dynamic, and complex and lead to food behaviors where people acquire, prepare, serve, give away, store, eat, and clean up. Many disciplines and fields examine decision making.PURPOSE: Several classes of theories are applicable to food decision making, including social behavior, social facts, and social definition perspectives. Each offers some insights but also makes limiting assumptions that prevent fully explaining food choice decisions.METHODS: We used constructionist social definition perspectives to inductively develop a food choice process model that organizes a broad scope of factors and dynamics involved in food behaviors.RESULTS: This food choice process model includes (1) life course events and experiences that establish a food choice trajectory through transitions, turning points, timing, and contexts; (2) influences on food choices that include cultural ideals, personal factors, resources, social factors, and present contexts; and (3) a personal system that develops food choice values, negotiates and balances values, classifies foods and situations, and forms/revises food choice strategies, scripts, and routines. The parts of the model dynamically interact to make food choice decisions leading to food behaviors.CONCLUSION: No single theory can fully explain decision making in food behavior. Multiple perspectives are needed, including constructionist thinking.